Can a Tenant Repair the Property and Deduct the Cost From Rents?

The case of Lipshutz et al v. Shantha (1977) was an argument about whether tendering into the court registry of valid receipts was acceptable in lieu of cash payments.  In that case it was deemed not to be, but the ruling did not apparently, convincely enough dispute Abrams v. Joel.  In his court brief Judge Webb refers to a state law amendment to 44-7-13 (1970) that excepted such language that had been recommended in the initial writing.  That should be indicative of congressional intent, and Judge Webb wrote: "The General Assembly having passed the Act in its present form, this court should not subvert the legislative will by a construction contrary to its express meaning."  That sort of supports my feeling about it.

I found in a later ruling, a brief on Swim Dixie Pool Corp v. Kramer et al (1981) mentions the rule but does not specifically apply it.  I have been aware of "Swim Dixie" for quite awhile but I had not taken that message from it before.  It usually pops up as a reference for other common law issues.  In this case the relevant argument was whether the tenant could pay into the court registry an amount of money to cover rents due that could have been offset by receipts for repairs made by tenant.  It was not allowed, but only on a technicality because the defendant (tenant) posed it in an amended answer that was deemed received too late by the court.  So the merits of the argument were never really tested.  Nevertheless, this case is often cited as a legal basis for a repair-and-deduct justification.

One could now make the argument that there is little case law other than Abrams v. Joel to support this procedure, and the fact that the General Assembly chose not to vote it into law seven years later should hold significant sway.  But in the end, I guess it comes down to understanding the prevailing attitude of the local judiciary.  I have discovered that regardless of what the law says, the local magistrate can and does often trump that without impunity.